Dynamic epigenetic regulation of initial O-glycosylation by UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine : peptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases - Site-specific glycosylation of MUC1 repeat peptide influences the substrate qualities at adjacent or distant Ser/Thr positions
Fg. Hanisch et al., Dynamic epigenetic regulation of initial O-glycosylation by UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine : peptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases - Site-specific glycosylation of MUC1 repeat peptide influences the substrate qualities at adjacent or distant Ser/Thr positions, J BIOL CHEM, 274(15), 1999, pp. 9946-9954
In search of possible epigenetic regulatory mechanisms ruling the initiatio
n of O-glycosylation by polypeptide:N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases, we
studied the influences of mono- and disaccharide substituents of glycopepti
de substrates on the site-specific in vitro addition of N-acetylgalactosami
ne (GalNAc) residues by recombinant GalNAc-Ts (rGalNAc-T1, -T2, and -T3), T
he substrates were 20-mers (HGV20) or 21-mers (AHG21) of the MUC1 tandem re
peat peptide carrying GalNAc alpha or Gal beta 1-3GalNAc alpha at different
positions. The enzymatic products were analyzed by MALDI mass spectrometry
and Edman degradation for the number and sites of incorporated GalNAc. Dis
accharide placed on the first position of the diad Ser-16-Thr-17 prevents g
lycosylation of the second, whereas disaccharide on the second position of
Ser-16-Thr-17 and Thr-5-Ser-6 does not prevent GalNAc addition to the first
. Multiple disaccharide substituents suppress any further glycosylation at
the remaining sites. Glycosylation of Ser-16 is negatively affected by glyc
osylation at position -6 (Thr-10) or -10 (Ser-6) and is inhibited by disacc
haride at position -11 (Thr-5), suggesting the occurrence of glycosylation-
induced effects on distant acceptor sites. Kinetic studies revealed the acc
elerated addition of GalNAc to Ser-16 adjacent Do GalNAc-substituted Thr-17
, demonstrating positive regulatory effects induced by glycosylation on the
monosaccharide level. These antagonistic effects of mono- and disaccharide
s could underlie a postulated regulatory mechanism.