Research was undertaken comparing teacher-pupil and pupil-pupil dyads using
computer-assisted learning programs, of both 'open' (where the means of ac
hieving the task goal are under the users' control) and 'closed' (where the
routes to achieving the task goal are much more controlled by the computer
) types. The interactions within teacher-pupil and pupil-pupil dyads whilst
using the programs were videorecorded and subsequently analysed to ascerta
in whether the nature of the software (open or closed) exerted any constrai
ning effect upon the dyads' interactions. Variations in interactional style
s were identified using quantitative methods; these, plus other more qualit
ative data are discussed with reference to specific examples of software. I
t is concluded that the open-closed distinction conflates several dimension
s of machine behaviour, particularly the number of options of action availa
ble to users at any given point, the frequency of computer interventions, t
he nature of computer interventions (eg. prompt versus question) and the gr
anularity of the task.