Agreement between self- and clinician-rated suicidal symptoms in a clinical sample of young adults: Explaining discrepancies

Citation
Te. Joiner et al., Agreement between self- and clinician-rated suicidal symptoms in a clinical sample of young adults: Explaining discrepancies, J CONS CLIN, 67(2), 1999, pp. 171-176
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
0022006X → ACNP
Volume
67
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
171 - 176
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-006X(199904)67:2<171:ABSACS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
This study compared self- versus clinician-rated suicide assessment among p articipants referred for suicidal ideation or behavior, with emphasis on un derstanding self- versus clinician-rated discrepancies. A total of 328 part icipants in a suicide-treatment project completed baseline measures of symp toms and personality (including self-report and clinician-rated indexes of suicidality), and portions of the sample completed follow-up assessments at 6, 12, and 18 months. A high rate of discrepancy between self- and clinici an ratings of suicidality Was noted; the nature of this discrepancy was suc h that clinicians were likely to see patients as high in suicidality, where as patients were less likely to see themselves as such. Data on future symp toms indicated that patients' self-ratings contained considerable probative value. Variables such as history of previous attempts and histrionic perso nality style may help explain self- versus clinician-rated discrepancies.