Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength

Citation
T. Yoshikawa et al., Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength, J DENT RES, 78(4), 1999, pp. 898-905
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00220345 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
898 - 905
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0345(199904)78:4<898:EODDAC>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
During polymerization of resin composites, shrinkage stresses compete with resin-dentin bonds in a manner that can cause failure of the bond, dependin g upon the configuration of the cavity, its depth, and the restorative tech nique. The hypothesis tested in this study was that the effect of cavity co nfiguration (C) and remaining dentin thickness (RDT) influence resin bond s trength to the dentin of Class I cavity floors. The occlusal enamel was gro und to expose a flat superficial dentin surface as a control (superficial d entin, C-factor = 1) in human extracted third molars. Cavities 3 mm long x 4 mm wide were prepared to a depth 2 mm below the ground dentin surfaces (d eep dentin within cavity floor, C-factor = 3). To assess the relationship b etween C-factor and RDT, we removed the walls of cavities, making a deep fl at surface for bonding (deep dentin, C-factor = I). The teeth were restored with either Clearfil Liner Bond II (LB II), One-Step (OS), or Super-Bond D Liner (DL), followed by Clearfil Photo Posterior resin composite. After 24 hrs' storage in water, the teeth were sectioned vertically into 3 or I sla bs (0.7 mm thick) and trimmed for the micro-tensile bond test so that we co uld determine the strength of the resin bonds to the pulpal floor. All grou ps gave high bond strengths to superficial dentin, but OS and DL gave signi ficantly lower bond strengths to flat deep dentin when the C-factor was 1. When the C-factor was increased to 3 by the creation of a three-dimensional cavity preparation, the bond strengths of ail materials fell (range, 21 to 35%), but the difference was significant (p < 0.05) only with DL. SEM obse rvations of failure patterns showed that specimens with high bond strengths tended to exhibit cohesive failures within the hybrid layer, while specime ns exhibiting low bond strengths showed failures at the tap of the hybrid l ayer. Some adhesives do not bond well to deep dentin, making them more susc eptible to polymerization shrinkage stress that develops in cavities with h igh C-factors.