We evaluated the importance of interviewer and subject effects on cocaine a
nd marijuana use disclosure in a sample of over 3,000 male juvenile arreste
es. Analyses evaluated the viability of Social Attribution and Conditional
Social Attribution models of interviewer effects. The viability of alternat
ive models was investigated in the context of comparative analyses excludin
g and including statistical adjustments for the clustering of responses by
interviewers. Interviewer effects were more salient in models predicting ma
rijuana disclosure than in models predicting cocaine disclosure. Logistic r
egression analyses provided support for Social Attribution and Conditional
Social Attribution models of interviewer effects. Models suggested large in
terviewer cluster effects. Cluster adjustment altered interpretation of eff
ects for both cocaine and marijuana. Subject race/ethnicity effects were sa
lient in models predicting disclosure for both drugs, but were especially l
arge in models predicting cocaine disclosure.