According to two-process accounts of recognition memory, a familiarity-base
d process is followed hy a slower, more accurate, recall-like process. The
dominant two-process account is the recall-to-reject account, in which this
second process facilitates the rejection of similar foils. To evaluate the
recall-to-reject account, we reanalyzed two experiments from Hintzman and
Curran (1994) in which subjects made word recognition judgments at differen
t response deadlines, and we conducted two new recognition experiments usin
g pairs of similar pseudowords. The new analyses included modeling at both
the group and individual subject levels. The results did not provide any di
stinctive evidence for recall-to-reject. In addition to discussing this two
-process account, we describe a one-process account of recognition, in whic
h dir nature of similarity information varies across the course of judgment
. (C) Academic Press.