Comparison between the end-diastolic images and the summed images of gatedTc-99m-sestamibi SPECT perfusion study in detection of coronary artery disease in women
R. Taillefer et al., Comparison between the end-diastolic images and the summed images of gatedTc-99m-sestamibi SPECT perfusion study in detection of coronary artery disease in women, J NUCL CARD, 6(2), 1999, pp. 169-176
Background. End-diastolic images (EDI) can be easily derived from technetiu
m 99m-sestamibi gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) pe
rfusion study (SGS), This may reduce the effect of myocardial wall thickeni
ng during systole and potentially improve the sensitivity of radionuclide p
erfusion imaging, especially in patients with small hearts.
Methods. This prospective study was conducted in 53 consecutive female pati
ents to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EDI with that of the summed imag
es (SI) of SGS, Fifty-three patients with suspected coronary artery disease
(CAD), scheduled for coronary angiography within 2 months, were evaluated
with SGS, Treadmill stress testing was used in 28 patients, and dipyridamol
e injection was used in the remaining 25 patients. A 2-day protocol was use
d as follows: stress test with 25 to 30 mCi of Tc-99m-sestamibi and a rest
study performed at least 24 hours later with the same dose. Sixteen frames
per cardiac cycle were acquired for both the rest and the stress studies. T
hree end-diastolic frames were used for EDI, and all the 16 frames were sum
med for SI. SI and EDI data reconstruction were interpreted by 3 experience
d blinded observers (consensus reading) during two distinct reading session
s, one with SI alone and the second with EDI alone. The heart was divided i
nto 17 segments.
Results. Coronary angiography showed greater than or equal to 50% stenoses
in 1 or more major coronary arteries in 38 patients and was normal in 15 pa
tients. The sensitivity was 73.7% (28/38) and 84.2% (32/38), respectively,
for SI and EDI. Three of 4 patients with CAD not detected by SI but seen wi
th EDI were considered to have relatively small hearts. The specificity was
86.7% (13/15) and 80.0% (12/15) for SI and EDI, respectively. On a total o
f 901 segments, 106 ischemic defects were detected by SI and 173 by EDI (P
= .001). The segmental agreement between the two techniques was 88.6% (798/
901 segments).
Conclusion. EDI showed more ischemic defects than SI, and there was also a
nonsignificant trend toward an improved sensitivity of EDI in comparison to
SI in detection of coronary artery disease in women, especially in patient
s with small hearts. EDI may be a useful adjunct to the standard perfusion
imaging with SGS in such a clinical situation.