The vehicle in which endectocide compounds are formulated plays a relevant
role in their absorption kinetics and resultant systemic availability, The
pharmaceutical bioequivalence and comparative plasma disposition kinetics o
f ivermectin (NM), following the subcutaneous administration of two injecta
ble formulations to pigs and cattle were investigated using parallel experi
mental designs, Sixteen parasite-free male Duroc Jersey-Yorkshire crossbred
pigs (90-110 kg) (Expt 1) and 16 parasite-free male Holstein calves (100-1
20 kg) (Expt 2) were divided into two groups and treated subcutaneously at
either 300 (pigs) or 200 (calves) mu g/kg with two different propylene glyc
ol/glycerol formal (60:40) based NM formulations; in both experiments pigs
or calves in Group A received the test (NM-TEST) formulation and those in G
roup B were treated with the reference formulation (IVM-CONTROL). Hepariniz
ed blood samples were taken from 0 h up to either 20 (pigs) or 30 (calves)
days post-treatment and plasma was extracted, derivatized and analysed by h
igh performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using fluorescence detection.
Early detection of NM (12 h) with a peak plasma concentration (C-max) betwe
en 33 and 39 ng/mL was observed in pigs. The drug was detected in plasma up
to 20 days postadministration of either formulation, resulting in eliminat
ion half-lives between 3.47 and 3.80 days, There were no differences betwee
n the NM-TEST and IVM-CONTROL formulations in the kinetic parameters (excep
t t(max)) obtained in pigs, IVM was detected in plasma between 12 h and 30
days postadministration of both formulations under investigation in cattle,
The plasma disposition kinetics of IVM in calves was similar following tre
atment with both formulations. C-max values (between 40.5 and 46.4 ng/mL) w
ere achieved at 2 days post-administration of both formulations. None of th
e estimated kinetic parameters were statistically different between drug fo
rmulations. The injectable IVM formulations investigated were bioequivalent
after their subcutaneous administration to both pigs and calves at recomme
nded dose rates.