This paper examines the recent developments affecting engineering education
. The introduction of ABET 2000 criteria, the proliferation of engineering
fields, and the changes in the characteristic of engineering teams are cons
idered. It concludes that the traditional engineering curriculum, which is
organized almost exclusively along the fields of engineering, is no longer
capable of producing engineers for the twenty-first century, and therefore
proposes a three-dimensional engineering curriculum, which is based on func
tion and employment sector, in addition to the field of engineering. Philos
ophically, this proposed 3-D curriculum shifts engineering education from k
nowing to doing, from fragmentation to integration, and from convergence to
divergence. On the practical level, the strength of the proposed 3-D curri
culum lies in it being flexible, adaptable, diverse, and resource-sensitive
. The diversity of possible programs resulting from the added dimensions en
ables engineering programs to develop a niche market, which has become an e
ssential survival strategy.