Ja. Shea et al., Self-reported physician specialties and the primary care content of medical practice - A study of the AMA Physician Masterfile, MED CARE, 37(4), 1999, pp. 333-338
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Health Care Sciences & Services
BACKGROUND. Many internal medicine physicians report both primary and secon
dary specialties in the American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Master
file. Usually, those represent combinations of general internal medicine an
d medical subspecialty practice. Whether reported specialty combinations ca
n be used to assess the contribution of specialists to primary care is unkn
own.
OBJECTIVES. TO examine whether internists' primary and secondary specialtie
s reported in the Masterfile reflect the amount of primary care that they p
rovide, and whether changes over time in internists' reported specialties r
eflect changes in primary care provision.
DESIGN. The Masterfile was used to identify internists' reported specialtie
s in 1992 and in 1996. A mail questionnaire was used to assess the primary
care content of physicians' practices. The association between reported spe
cialties and the amount of primary care provided was evaluated using analys
is of variance.
SUBJECTS. A stratified random sample of internists in active clinical pract
ice.
MEASURES. The percentage of visits which were for the general medical care
of patients for whom the physicians maintained ongoing responsibility. In a
ddition, how often the physicians initiated the provision of preventive car
e for their regular patients, provided general medical care to these patien
ts, and organized and coordinated the care received by these patients from
other providers.
RESULTS. There was a strong association between the internists' primary and
secondary specialties reported in the Masterfile and measures of the prima
ry care content of physicians' practices (P < 0.0001). In contrast, changes
over time in internists' reported specialties were not associated with phy
sicians' assessments of changes in the primary care content of their practi
ces.
CONCLUSIONS. Aggregate estimates of the availability of primary care in the
US could be adjusted by taking into account the primary and secondary spec
ialties reported by internal medicine physicians in the AMA Physician Maste
rfile.