Object To develop and evaluate the effect of having a personal learning log
on Senior House Officers knowledge and confidence.
Methods A multiple choice paper and a confidence checklist for two hospital
specialties were developed to assess knowledge and confidence. These were
administered to a control group and to an intervention group who had the le
arning log. Both groups completed an evaluation at the end of the post.
Setting The study took place in Accident & Emergency and Obstetric & Gynaec
ology posts in Greater Glasgow and Lanarkshire.
Subjects 79 Senior House Officers in Accident & Emergency and 78 Senior Hou
se Officers in Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
Results The mean scores in the MCQ and the mode in the confidence checklist
increased significantly in both specialties during the post, but there was
no significant difference between the control and intervention groups. For
ty two learning logs were returned at the end of the study and analysis of
these revealed that there was great scope for learning but few documented t
he specific learning achieved. Evaluation of the posts revealed that some i
mprovements had taken place in teaching and assessment frequency, however,
there was scope for further improvement.
Conclusion While the problems of hospital training are well documented, an
attempt to improve the situation using a learning log did not have a statis
tically significant impact on SHO knowledge or confidence. A six-month hosp
ital post appears to present many opportunities for learning but these are
not exploited. It is suggested that three things are needed. Firstly, activ
e participation by and personalized feedback from a senior member of staff,
with training where needed. Secondly, protected time for tutorials with a
planned system of formative assessment, and thirdly, a more positive approa
ch to learning by both SHOs and consultants. Once this occurs, a learning l
og may have a more significant impact on training.