Sk. Clinton, DIET, ANTHROPOMETRY AND BREAST-CANCER - INTEGRATION OF EXPERIMENTAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC APPROACHES, The Journal of nutrition, 127, 1997, pp. 916-920
The interrelationships of dietary fat and energy, growth rates and ant
hropometry, and breast carcinogenesis have been examined by a diverse
array of approaches throughout the last 50 y as new investigative tool
s have been developed by laboratory scientists and epidemiologists. A
consensus among investigators has not emerged, however, and dietary re
commendations for breast cancer prevention have not been clearly formu
lated or effectively communicated to the public. Indeed, the gap betwe
en those investigators utilizing laboratory-based approaches and those
using epidemiologic models has expanded in recent years. Cancer epide
miologists have become increasingly skeptical that results derived for
m laboratory animal models of breast carcinogenesis and in vitro syste
ms are directly applicable to human breast cancer risk. Concurrently,
laboratory scientists have questioned the ability of epidemiological t
ools to accurately measure dietary intake and relevant biomarkers and
to account for a diverse array of potentially confounding environmenta
l and genetic factors characteristic of human populations under study.
These polarized views are reinforced by a failure of investigators us
ing diverse approaches to interact, integrate their skills and resourc
es, develop novel hypotheses, and propose solutions using both laborat
ory and epidemiologic techniques. Therefor, the objectives of this sym
posium are to summarize experimental and epidemiologic knowledge, fost
er communication and collaboration, and attempt to identify appropriat
e studies to bridge the gaps in our knowledge concerning dietary lipid
and energy, anthropometrics, and breast cancer risk.