Both synaesthesia and eidetics have a common characteristic of cognitive de
differentiation. Synaesthesia (eg colour-hearing) entails the dedifferentia
tion of the sensory modalities, while eidetic imagery entails the dediffere
ntiation of imagery and perception. One can profitably gain by investigatin
g both within the same study. Moreover, some of the same issues have arisen
in these, hitherto, separate research literatures. This behoves a common f
ramework for analysis and investigation. We applied a technique previously
used for identifying child eidetikers, for screening the adult population,
looking at both phenomena in the same sample. After screening, we selected
a total of twenty-nine individuals for controlled testing of both phenomena
and their variants (structural eidetic imagery, typographic eidetic imager
y, colour - hearing synaesthesia, colour - mood synaesthesia). Our particip
ants also completed a number of questionnaires of relevance (absorption, di
ssociation, and hallucination). We found that the personality trait of abso
rption underlies the commonality of experience tapped by both typographic a
nd structural eidetic imagery. Furthermore, the latter phenomena were found
to have a common pseudohallucinatory experiential base. For subjects scori
ng relatively high on the absorption scale, there is a negative correlation
between structural eidetic imagery and colour-mood synaesthetic differenti
ation, replicating to a degree results reported earlier.