The Computer Assisted Language Analysis System (CALAS) was used to examine
the relationship of various linguistic measures to outcome measures in high
and low verbalized affect segments of 32 patients in psychotherapy. Result
s indicated that in the high affect segments, therapists with poor outcome
cases used more "cognitive" verbs than therapists with good outcome cases.
Therapists in general differed from patients by speaking with a more differ
entiated pattern of speech in both the high and low affect segments. Specif
ically, therapists used relatively more stative verbs in high affect segmen
ts and more action verbs in low affect segments than patients. Therapists a
lso included more information in their speech, but spoke more efficiently (
i.e., fewer embedded clauses) than patients. It is suggested that lexical m
easures may supplement existing measures in the study of psychotherapy dial
ogue.