This paper reports an experiment which investigates a possible cognitive an
tecedent of event-splitting effects (ESEs) experimentally observed by Starm
er and Sugden (1993) and Humphrey (1995) - the learning of absolute frequen
cy of event category impacting on the learning of probability of event cate
gory - and reveals some evidence that it is responsible for observed ESEs.
It is also suggested and empirically substantiated that stripped-down prosp
ect theory will accurately predict ESEs in some decision making tasks, but
will not perform well in others. This contention, it is argued, is indicati
ve of fundamental descriptive shortcomings in the economic conception of ch
oice under uncertainty and may entail implications beyond the direct concer
ns of this paper.