Application of a diagnostic clinical model for the management of hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis

Citation
Ps. Wells et al., Application of a diagnostic clinical model for the management of hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis, THROMB HAEM, 81(4), 1999, pp. 493-497
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
ISSN journal
03406245 → ACNP
Volume
81
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
493 - 497
Database
ISI
SICI code
0340-6245(199904)81:4<493:AOADCM>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the determination of pret est probability using a simple clinical model and the SimpliRED D-dimer cou ld be used to improve the management of hospitalized patients with suspecte d deep-vein thrombosis. Consecutive hospitalized patients with suspected de ep-vein thrombosis, had their pretest probability determined using a clinic al model and had a SimpliRED D-dimer assay, Patients at low pretest probabi lity underwent a single ultrasound test. A negative ultrasound excluded the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis whereas a positive ultrasound was confir med by venography. Patients at moderate pretest probability with a positive ultrasound were treated for deep-vein thrombosis whereas patients with an initial negative ultrasound underwent a single follow-up ultrasound one wee k later. Patients at high pretest probability with a positive ultrasound we re treated whereas those with negative ultrasound underwent venography. All patients were followed for three months for the development of venous thro mboembolic complications. Overall, 28% (42/150), and 10% (5/50), 21% (14/71 ) and 76% (22/29) of the low, moderate and high pretest probability patient s, respectively, had deep vein thrombosis. Two of 111 (1.8%; 95% CI = 0.02% to 6.4%) patients considered to have deep vein thrombosis excluded had eve nts during three-month follow-up: Overall 13 of 150 (8.7%) required venogra phy and serial testing was limited to 58 of 150 (38.7%) patients. The negat ive predictive value of the SimpliRED D-dimer in patients with low pretest probability was 96.2%, which is not statistically different from the negati ve predictive value of a negative ultrasound result in low pretest probabil ity patients (97.8%). Management of hospitalized patients with suspected de ep-vein thrombosis based on clinical probability and ultrasound of the prox imal deep veins is safe and feasible.