In the current Literature, the efficacy of learning strategies is often eva
luated by using learning strategy questionnaires and taking school marks, t
ests or high school levels as criteria. Most of these studies show that lea
rning, strategies are unsatisfactory predictors of learning achievements. W
e suggest that this is in part a question of operationalization of construc
ts. Efficacy evaluations of learning strategies should be dome using microa
nalytic action research. We investigated 4 th, 6 th and 8 th graders who st
udied a text by analyzing their use of learning strategies as well as their
learning achievements. We found significant quantitative and partly signif
icant qualitative learning achievement differences depending on learning st
rategy use. Furthermore, emotional and motivational variables were found to
affect learning achievement via the use of strategies; thus, learning stra
tegies mediated the observed relationships.