The debate over the relationship between economic development and environme
ntal protection has polarized into the opposing perspectives of win-lose (d
istributive bargaining) or win-win (integrative bargaining) outcomes, remin
iscent of the debate that occurred within the negotiations field 15 years a
go. The authors argue that such polarization is unnecessary and inaccurate
Conflict between economics and the environment is neither purely win-win no
r win-lose; bur rather: it is a mixed-motive situation. In presenting this
argument, the authors draw from the negotiations and managerial decision-ma
king literature. Furthermore, they consider some strategies for exposing mi
xed-motive solutions to environmental problems in the future.