Human ingenuity offers the best hope for tackling a whole range of environm
ental problems currently threatening global welfare, yet the human mind als
o creates cognitive barriers to wise environmental agreements. In this arti
cle, the authors focus on a set of six systematic cognitive barriers that a
re particularly endemic to environmental disputes. The fixed-pie bias grows
from the assumption that disputants' interests are perfectly opposed This
mythical fixed pie inhibits the discovery of beneficial trade-offs that int
egrate parties' interests. The authors also discuss five other cognitive bi
ases that combine with the fixed-pie assumption to influence the resolution
of disputes in the environmental domain: pseudosacredness, ego-centrism, o
verconfidence, unrealistic optimism, and endowment effects. They discuss th
e potential role of learning and experience in improving negotiator perform
ance and conclude with prescriptive advice for overcoming these cognitive b
arriers.