Dw. Vogler et al., Floral plasticity in an iteroparous plant: The interactive effects of genotype, environment, and ontogeny in Campanula rapunculoides (Campanulaceae), AM J BOTANY, 86(4), 1999, pp. 482-494
Phenotypic variation in 11 floral and reproductive traits was studied in cl
oned plants of Campanula rapunculoides replicated in three discrete environ
ments. Using an ANOVA approach, we determined the relative influence of gen
otype (G), environment (E), G x E interaction. and ontogeny (position on th
e raceme) on the 11 traits. Two traits, duration of flowering and pollen si
ze, showed no significant variation. All nine remaining traits had signific
ant genotypic variation, accounting for 21-38% of the total phenotypic vari
ation. Correlations among variant traits in seven genotypes were predominan
tly positive, but several significant correlations in one environment chang
ed sign or were nonsignificant in another environment. Ovule number was neg
atively correlated with most male function traits: the negative correlation
between ovule and pollen number was particularly strong and consistent acr
oss environments. Six traits varied significantly across environments, incl
uding number of flowers. number of ovules per flower. and duration of the m
ale phase, but pollen traits did not show a significant environmental main
effect. The G x E interaction was significant for Bower number. corolla siz
e, nectar quality, duration of the male phase, pollen viability, and ovule
number. The contribution of interaction variance to the total phenotypic va
riation (5-14%) was comparable to that of the environment alone (7-21%). Ov
ule number decreased in Rowers on the upper part of the raceme by nearly 25
%, but other traits did not vary significantly by floral position. These re
sults suggest that (1) pollen traits are buffered against environmental cha
nge more than ovule number or other floral characters. (2) a male-female tr
ade-off exists and is complicated by ontogenic factors, (3) G x E interacti
ons are common but may have small effects, and (4) specific correlation pat
ter ns among floral traits can be dependent upon the environment under whic
h they develop.