Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele

Citation
Sh. Cruikshank et Sr. Kovac, Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele, AM J OBST G, 180(4), 1999, pp. 859-864
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029378 → ACNP
Volume
180
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
859 - 864
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(199904)180:4<859:RCOTSM>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study compared 3 surgical methods of prophylaxis against en terocele formation employed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred consecutive women undergoing total vaginal hyster ectomy for various reasons were randomly assigned to have 1 of 3 surgical m ethods applied to the posterior superior aspect of the vagina for prophylax is against enterocele formation. The first procedure involved closing the c ul-de-sac and bringing the uterosacral-cardinal complex together in the mid line in a vaginal Moschcowitz-type operation. The second procedure was a Mc Call-type culdeplasty to obliterate the cul-de-sac, plicate the uterosacral -cardinal complex, and elevate any redundant posterior vaginal apex. The th ird technique used only the peritoneum to close the cul-de-sac, allowing pa ssive movement of the uterosacral-cardinal complex to the midline, no oblit eration per se, and no elevation of the posterior vagina. Postoperative fin dings on pelvic examination were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi(2) test of ind ependence. RESULTS: At 6 weeks' follow-up and at 3 months' follow-up there were no pro lapses involving the posterior superior segment of the vagina. At I year of follow-up 11 patients had stage 1 or 2 posterior superior segment prolapse . At 2 years' follow-up this number was 16. At 3 years' follow-up the McCal l-type method was statistically better (chi(2) = 11.27 With 2 degrees of fr eedom, P=.004) than the other 2 in preventing postoperative enterocele (n = 2 of 32 with McCall-type procedure, n = 10 of 33 with vaginal Moschcowitz- type procedure, and n = 13 of 33 with peritoneal closure only). CONCLUSION: When applied at the time of vaginal hysterectomy the McCall-typ e culdeplasty is superior to a vaginal Moschcowitz-type procedure and to si mple peritoneal closure in preventing subsequent enterocele.