Hypothesis: This study aimed to compare reaction times (RTs) to auditory st
imuli of two groups of normal-hearing subjects differing only in terms of t
innitus sensation.
Background: The RTs to auditory stimuli as a psychophysical measurement for
threshold and suprathreshold hearing are said to provide a behavioral clue
to some aspects of neural processing in the auditory system.
Methods: To explore how patients with tinnitus perceive the intensity of th
reshold and suprathreshold sound stimuli, RTs were obtained from normal-hea
ring subjects with tinnitus (experimental group, N = 15) and from normal-he
aring subjects without tinnitus (control group, N = 15) by means of exposur
e to two different sets of frequencies: the tinnitus frequencies and the no
ntinnitus frequency of 1,000 Hz.
Results: There were significant differences in RTs in the experimental grou
p and in the control group not only for the tinnitus frequencies, but also
for the nontinnitus frequency of 1,000 Hz. The experimental group had short
er RTs than did the control group at sensation levels (SLs) near the thresh
old, with no significant differences between groups at sound stimuli in the
suprathreshold intensity range.
Conclusions: It is assumed that the above-mentioned reduction in RTs shows
a dysfunction of cochlear mechanisms contributing to tinnitus. Conversely,
tinnitus also can be considered as an additional auditory input leading to
shorter RTs at SLs near the threshold. The current study suggests that the
reaction time procedure to auditory stimuli offers complementary informatio
n on tinnitus sensation and might be a valuable method in demonstrating gen
eral differences and tendencies that have been neglected so far. Analysis f
or the mechanisms of tinnitus sensation allows for the possibility of facil
itating the process of tinnitus habituation and, ultimately, the relief fro
m it.