Wf. Liu et T. Harrington, The need for delivery room intubation of thin meconium in the low-risk newborn: A clinical trial, AM J PERIN, 15(12), 1998, pp. 675-682
The delivery room management of meconium-stained amniotic fluid remains con
troversial. We attempted to determine if intubation of the low-risk newborn
with thin meconium affects the incidence of respiratory symptoms. Exclusio
n criterion included moderate or thick meconium, fetal distress, neonatal d
epression, or prematurity. Eligible infants were randomized to either an in
tubation (group 1) or to a nonintubation group (group II). The outcome was
the presence of respiratory symptoms. Patients were studied from May 1994 t
o June 1997. There were 8967 births during this period: 7.9% (708/8967) wer
e delivered through meconium. Thin meconium was noted in 50.3% (356/708) of
all births. 24/356 infants with thin meconium were excluded for medical cr
iterion. One hundred sixty-three infants were medically eligible but could
not be randomized due to lack of consent, late arrival of the team, or obst
etrician request. These were placed into intubation (group I B) and nonintu
bation (group It B) groups. Seventy-seven infants were randomized into grou
p I and 92 infants into group It. From the intubation groups I and I B, one
required supplemental oxygen and was weaned to room air in 7 hr. From the
nonintubation groups II and II B, two infants required oxygen, weaning to r
oom air in 11 and 46 hr. Comparing birth weight, gestational age, sex, mode
of delivery and 5-min Apgar, there were no significant differences. How ev
er, the intubation groups had significantly lower I-min Apgar scores. There
was no airway morbidity reported in the intubation groups. In the infant w
ith thin meconium and an otherwise low-risk pregnancy, we were unable to de
monstrate a difference in respiratory symptoms with intubation and intratra
cheal suctioning.