Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in normal subjects

Citation
Pe. Silkoff et al., Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in normal subjects, AM J RHINOL, 13(2), 1999, pp. 131-135
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY
ISSN journal
10506586 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
131 - 135
Database
ISI
SICI code
1050-6586(199903/04)13:2<131:ROARAR>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The reproducibility of nasal patency measurements was assessed by acoustic rhinometry and active rhinomanometry using previously described Toronto met hodologies. Sh subjects with normal upper airways were tested with both pro cedures on sh separate occasions within a 2-month period. Topical decongest ant was applied to minimize the effects of mucosal variarion on the nasal a irway. The mean coefficients of variation (mean +/- s.d. %) over time of th e measurements were 8.1 +/- 4.1 and 9.7 +/- 5.2 for minimal unilateral cros s-sectional area and 4.8 +/- 1.8 and 5.5 +/- 3.5 for nasal volume (0-5 cm) of the right and left sides, respectively. For active rhinomanometry, the m ean coefficients of variation (mean +/- s.d.; %) over rime of the measureme nts were 15.9 +/- 7.3, 12.9 +/- 4.6, and 8.5 +/- 2.8 for right, left and co mbined nasal airflow resistance. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76, 0.70, and 0.96 for right, left, and combined nasal resistance, 0.91 and 0.87 for right and left minimal cross sectional area, and 0.86 and 0.69 for right and left nasal volumes, respectively, also confirming a high lev el of reproducibility for both methods. In conclusion, performed by nit exp erienced operator under controlled circumstances, the reproducibility of bo th methods of nasal patency assessment compared favourably with many widely accepted clinical rests.