Objectives: To assess expenses generated by prescriptions from anaesthesiol
ogists in the operating theatre, recovery rooms, surgical intensive therapy
units, postoperative care on surgical wards (digestive surgery, orthopaedi
cs, gynaecology, obstetrics. paediatric surgery).
Methods: Prospective study (one year) with evaluation of the costs induced
by intravenous and volatile anaesthetics, morphinic and non morphinic analg
esics, neuromuscular blocking agents, crystalloids, antibiotics, intravenou
s nutrient solutions, blood substitutes, anticoagulants, vitamins and vasoa
ctive drugs.
Results: The expenses resulting from these prescriptions reached the quarte
r of the total drug hospital budget. They were equally distributed between
anaesthesia and intensive therapy units on the one hand and postoperative c
are on surgical wards on the other hand. Intravenous anaesthetic agents, an
tibiotics, crystalloids, represented each one more than 10% of the total co
st.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates the weight of prescriptions by anaesth
esiologists in the hospital budget. At our hospital, it was mainly dug to t
heir activity outside the operating theatre, especially on surgical wards.
Therefore anaesthesiologists are essential partners for the elaboration of
a cost containment policy. (C) 1999 Elsevier, Paris.