Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS) Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS)pilot comparison study in Europe

Citation
Rd. Battmer et al., Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS) Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS)pilot comparison study in Europe, ANN OTOL RH, 108(4), 1999, pp. 69-73
Citations number
4
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology,"da verificare
Journal title
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
ISSN journal
00034894 → ACNP
Volume
108
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Part
2
Supplement
177
Pages
69 - 73
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4894(199904)108:4<69:SAS(CI>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The recent availability of the enhanced bipolar electrode array in the CLAR ION(R) Multi-Strategy(TM) Cochlear Implant has permitted clinicians to fit patients successfully with the Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS) strate gy by means of bipolar coupling. Out of 22 consecutively implanted subjects , 20 subjects could be fitted with both Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS ) and SAS strategies. Their performance was evaluated up to 3 months postop eratively. Speech perception results, as well as the patient's preference f or either CIS or SAS, were examined. It was found that half of the subjects selected SAS as their preferred strategy and that the use of a preferred s trategy resulted in higher overall patient performance. Further analyses sh owed that those subjects preferring SAS had higher electrode impedance valu es and lon:er threshold and most comfortable loudness levels than subjects preferring CIS. We presume that these psychophysical findings are, in part, related to the position of the intracochlear electrode array. Specifically , SAS users may have a more modiolus-hugging electrode array position.