A phase I/II study of vinorelbine, doxorubicin, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

Citation
S. Subramanyan et al., A phase I/II study of vinorelbine, doxorubicin, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer, CANC CHEMOT, 43(6), 1999, pp. 497-502
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
03445704 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
497 - 502
Database
ISI
SICI code
0344-5704(199906)43:6<497:APISOV>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose ( MTD) and toxicity of vinorelbine when used in combination with doxorubicin and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue in women with metastatic breast can cer. Methods: Enrolled in the study were 23 women with metastatic breast ca ncer who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patien ts treated at the first dose level received vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on day 1 , doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1, methotrexate 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and leuc ovorin 20 mg orally every 6 h for six doses beginning on day 2. Treatment w as repeated every 21 days. The vinorelbine dose was escalated by 5 mg/m(2) for patients treated at subsequent dose levels. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which fewer than one-third of patients enrolled experienced d ose-limiting toxicity (DLT). When the MTD of vinorelbine had been determine d, the doxorubicin dose was then escalated by 10 mg/m(2) with the vinorelbi ne dose held at its MTD. Results: total of 98 courses of treatment (median of 4 per patient, range 2-8) were administered. The MTD of this regimen was found to be vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2), and methotrexa te 100 mg/m2 with leucovorin rescue. At higher doses of vinorelbine, neutro penia, fatigue, arm pain, malaise, nausea and vomiting were dose-limiting. Higher doses of doxorubicin resulted in universal dose limiting neutropenia , and frequent nonhematologic DLT consisting of arm pain, malaise, stomatit is, nausea and vomiting. Amongst the 20 patients with measurable disease, t here were 3 complete responses (15%, 95% confidence interval 3%-38%), 5 par tial responses (25%, 95% confidence interval 9%-49%) and an overall respons e rate of 40% (95% confidence interval 19%-64%). The median survival was es timated to be 25 months from the start of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Vinore lbine at 25 mg/m(2) can be safely administered with doxorubicin at 40 mg/m( 2) and methotrexate at 100 mg/(2) with leucovorin rescue. Response rates ob served with this regimen suggest that this combination of chemotherapeutic agents may not be more effective than the combination of vinorelbine and do xorubicin.