J. Martens et al., Can keratin 8 and 17 immunohistochemistry be of diagnostic value in cervical cytology? A feasibility study, CANC CYTOP, 87(2), 1999, pp. 87-92
BACKGROUND. Based on results from evaluation of tissue sections from premal
ignant lesions of the uterine cenix, the authors examined the hypothesis th
at immunostaining of Papanicolaou-stained cytologic smears with monoclonal
antibodies to keratins 8 and 17 allows detection of cervical intraepithelia
l neoplasia (CIN) with progressive potential. They also investigated whethe
r detection of these two keratin subtypes could be of help in the analysis
of normal and/or poor quality cytology smears.
METHODS. Sixty-one Papanicolaou-stained smears, representing 25 normal smea
rs, 8 CIN 1, 7 CIN 2, 18 CIN 3, and 3 cervical carcinomas, were stained wit
h CAM 5.2 and E3, which are capable of detecting keratin 8 and 17, respecti
vely. The percent ages of immunoreactive normal, metaplastic, dysplastic, a
nd malignant epithelial cells were determined.
RESULTS. In normal cervical smears, keratin 8 was detected in endocervical
columnar cells and sporadically in immature squamous metaplastic cells. Ker
atin 17 was identified in reserve cells and frequently in immature squamous
metaplasic cells. In GIN, the number of cases in which keratin 8 was prese
nt increased with the severity of the lesion. Keratin 17 was found in the m
ajority of CIN lesions, irrespective of grade. Intensity of immunostaining
and number of cells stained per lesion varied and were also not related to
the severity of GIN.
CONCLUSIONS, The use of the keratin 8 antibody in normal cervical smears en
abled the detection of endocervical cells in cases where they were thought
to be absent, particularly in cases with severe inflammation. Staining with
keratin 17 enabled the identification of reserve cells or immature metapla
stic cells, which were often misinterpreted as parabasal cells. The applica
tion of antibodies to these subtypes of keratins in cervical cytology can t
o a certain extent help in the identification of CIN and may in future be t
ested in automated screening. (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.