Sd. Gokhale et al., FUNCTIONAL-RESPONSES OF THE RAT ISOLATED SEMINAL-VESICLE TO ELECTRICAL-FIELD STIMULATION - A PHARMACOLOGICAL ANALYSIS, Clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology, 23(1), 1996, pp. 22-29
1. Electrical field stimulation (EFS) of the rat isolated seminal vesi
cle elicited frequency-dependent and tetrodotoxin sensitive contractio
ns which were unaltered by hexamethonium or mecamylamine. 2. Prazosin
alone was not sufficient to abolish these responses, but a combination
of atropine and prazosin was fully effective, indicating involvement
of both noradrenergic and cholinergic mechanisms. 3. Responses were pr
edominantly cholinergic (blocked by atropine, potentiated by ecothiopa
te but not significantly altered by prazosin or guanethidine) at 1-8 H
z but became increasingly noradrenergic (blocked by prazosin or guanet
hidine but relatively unaltered by atropine or ecothiopate) with incre
asing frequencies of stimulation. 4. Electrical field stimulation of s
eminal vesicles removed from reserpine or 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-p
retreated rats produced contractions that were clearly cholinergic in
nature. 5. After exposing the seminal vesicles to guanethidine, or aft
er pretreatment of rats with 6-OHDA, responses to EFS remained, indica
ting that activation of discrete cholinergic and noradrenergic innerva
tions seem to underlie the contractile responses observed. 6. Yohimbin
e and prazosin potentiated the predominantly cholinergic responses at
1, 2 and 4 Hz in tissues from untreated rats, but not in those from an
imals pretreated with reserpine or 6-OHDA, indicating the possibility
of an interaction between the two innervations. 7. No inhibitory respo
nses to EFS could be demonstrated in tissues precontracted with KCl in
the presence of a combination of atropine and prazosin suggesting the
absence of a nonadrenergic, noncholinergic inhibitory innervation.