This paper presents the major findings from the project 'Development of new
methods for evaluation of library Web sites on the World Wide Web'. The re
port includes a brief examination and discussion of quality applied to Web
sites in general and concerning library Web sites in particular Findings fr
om a few empirical surveys are presented. A new list of quality criteria fo
r evaluation of academic libraries is compiled. The list is tested on three
Danish academic libraries. Finally, a revised list of criteria is applied
to twelve major Danish academic libraries. The findings include the panelli
sts' scores and their verbal comments. The main conclusion is that the Web
sites of the Danish academic libraries in question are above average compar
ed with Web sites in general. They do not, however come up to expectations
as virtual expressions of the quality levels of the libraries. This situati
on can only be improved if the libraries allocate the necessary resources r
egarding updating and development of the Web sites. This should be done on
the basis of regular user studies and comparative evaluations.