This article explores 'European foreign policy' as an important. new empiri
cal domain of foreign policy and also as a challenging vehicle for evaluati
ng the current status of Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA). It begins by identi
fying the weaknesses of the dominant institutionalist mode of analysis of f
oreign policy activity in Europe which include a restrictive definition of
'foreign policy' in this context. A case is then made for arguing that crit
ics of FPA have underestimated the significance of developments in this sub
-field of International Relations over the last 30 years and that 'traditio
nal' FPA can be adapted to aid the task of understanding the complex arena
of European foreign policy defined here as constituted by three interrelate
d types of activity; Community, Union and National (member states') foreign
policy. Having sketched out an analytical framework which demonstrates the
continuing strengths of FPA, the article reflects upon what we might learn
from this application about the weaknesses of this mode of analysis. Conti
nuing problems notwithstanding, a revitalized FPA is revealed here which ha
s the potential to incorporate both positivist and 'postpositivist' approac
hes.