COMPARISON OF STRAIN AND STRESS TENSOR ORIENTATION - APPLICATION TO IRAN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Authors
Citation
D. Gillard et M. Wyss, COMPARISON OF STRAIN AND STRESS TENSOR ORIENTATION - APPLICATION TO IRAN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, J GEO R-SOL, 100(B11), 1995, pp. 22197-22213
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Geosciences, Interdisciplinary
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
ISSN journal
21699313 → ACNP
Volume
100
Issue
B11
Year of publication
1995
Pages
22197 - 22213
Database
ISI
SICI code
2169-9313(1995)100:B11<22197:COSAST>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Strain and stress tensors along plate boundaries in Iran and southern California are oriented coaxially if they are estimated based on small to moderate earthquakes. If large earthquakes (M>7) are included in t he analysis, the estimate of stress directions does not change, but th e orientation of the released strain rotates significantly. Thus the d irection of the total released strain is different from the stress by about 20 degrees in both Iran and southern California, and by about 45 degrees in central California. We interpret this observation to indic ate that the smaller earthquakes occur an faults favorably oriented fo r failure in the prevailing stress field, in which they are possibly g enerated. The larger events rupture near-vertical strike-slip faults t hat are unfavorably oriented but weak. This weakness causes failure un der low ratio of shear to normal stress. This view is supported by the fact that, in the southern California data set, the average angle bet ween the fault planes and the greatest principal stress is about 40 de grees, whereas it forms an angle of 70 degrees with the San Andreas fa ult (nearly 90 degrees in central California). For estimating the seis mic strain release by Kostrov's method along about a 10-km-wide sectio n of the San Andreas fault zone, we used the data set from which Jones determined the stress directions for earthquakes in the range of 2.6< M less than or equal to 4.3. We estimated the directions of principal strain for Iran based on 111 focal mechanisms and the scalar moment fo r earthquakes in the range of 4.4<M<8. We inverted regional subsets of these data for volumes with dimensions of a few hundred kilometers fo r the stress directions using the method of Gephart and Forsyth. The a verage misfits for these inversions ranged from 2 degrees to 5 degrees . Based on test inversions of synthetic data with known misfits, we fo und that these misfits can be attributed solely to inaccuracies of les s than 10 degrees in the fault plane solutions. Therefore the results for Iran are most likely obtained for volumes with uniform stress dire ctions. We propose that stress inversions with misfits smaller than 6 degrees can be accepted as meaningful, as an approximate general guide line, because our tests for Iran agree with those for Hawaiian data se ts performed by Wyss.