D. Gillard et M. Wyss, COMPARISON OF STRAIN AND STRESS TENSOR ORIENTATION - APPLICATION TO IRAN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, J GEO R-SOL, 100(B11), 1995, pp. 22197-22213
Strain and stress tensors along plate boundaries in Iran and southern
California are oriented coaxially if they are estimated based on small
to moderate earthquakes. If large earthquakes (M>7) are included in t
he analysis, the estimate of stress directions does not change, but th
e orientation of the released strain rotates significantly. Thus the d
irection of the total released strain is different from the stress by
about 20 degrees in both Iran and southern California, and by about 45
degrees in central California. We interpret this observation to indic
ate that the smaller earthquakes occur an faults favorably oriented fo
r failure in the prevailing stress field, in which they are possibly g
enerated. The larger events rupture near-vertical strike-slip faults t
hat are unfavorably oriented but weak. This weakness causes failure un
der low ratio of shear to normal stress. This view is supported by the
fact that, in the southern California data set, the average angle bet
ween the fault planes and the greatest principal stress is about 40 de
grees, whereas it forms an angle of 70 degrees with the San Andreas fa
ult (nearly 90 degrees in central California). For estimating the seis
mic strain release by Kostrov's method along about a 10-km-wide sectio
n of the San Andreas fault zone, we used the data set from which Jones
determined the stress directions for earthquakes in the range of 2.6<
M less than or equal to 4.3. We estimated the directions of principal
strain for Iran based on 111 focal mechanisms and the scalar moment fo
r earthquakes in the range of 4.4<M<8. We inverted regional subsets of
these data for volumes with dimensions of a few hundred kilometers fo
r the stress directions using the method of Gephart and Forsyth. The a
verage misfits for these inversions ranged from 2 degrees to 5 degrees
. Based on test inversions of synthetic data with known misfits, we fo
und that these misfits can be attributed solely to inaccuracies of les
s than 10 degrees in the fault plane solutions. Therefore the results
for Iran are most likely obtained for volumes with uniform stress dire
ctions. We propose that stress inversions with misfits smaller than 6
degrees can be accepted as meaningful, as an approximate general guide
line, because our tests for Iran agree with those for Hawaiian data se
ts performed by Wyss.