Diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer since the population-wide introduction of a mammography screening programme in the ambulant health care systemof Luxembourg
M. Stieber et al., Diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer since the population-wide introduction of a mammography screening programme in the ambulant health care systemof Luxembourg, GEBURTSH FR, 59(4), 1999, pp. 150-156
Introduction: The efficiency of mammography screening in highly specialized
diagnostic centres has been well proven for the age group 50-64 years. Few
data is available concerning the value of such a screening under decentral
ised, population-wide conditions. Since 1992, a mammography screening progr
am (LMSP) organised in this way is being offered in Luxembourg to the age g
roup 50-64 years.
Materials and methods: The early outcome Indicators of this screening progr
amme were evaluated retrospectively. The pathological characteristics of al
l the diagnosed breast cancers, their diagnosis and their therapy before (1
989) and after (1993) the introduction of the mammography screening program
me were compared and analysed.
Results: The early outcome indicators of Luxembourg's mammography screening
programme were just below the comparable values of other specialised centr
es. Since the introduction of this programme one notes a significant increa
se in the number of open breast biopsies in comparison to the period before
the screening programme (p = 0.0001), with a highly significant increase i
n benign biospies (p = 0.00001). The ratio cancer/all biopsies dropped non-
significantly from 0.35 to 0.28 (p = 0.09). Atypical proliferative hyperpla
sias and in situ carcinomas increased significantly in number (p = 0.01) as
did the number of early invasive cancers (p = 0.0015). The lymph node stat
us did not change significantly although there was an increase in node-nega
tive tumours (p = 0.11). The number of conservative surgical procedures inc
reased significantly (p = 0.00001). In the age group analysis these changes
were significant only in the age group 50-64 years (p = 0.0002). All these
changes were not only due to the evolution within the screening cohort, bu
t also to the changes among the tumour patients diagnosed outside the scree
ning programme.
Conclusion: The early outcome indicators of this mammography screening prov
e a possible efficiency even under population-wide, non-specialised screeni
ng conditions. Nevertheless, studies over a longer period of time will be n
ecessary to analyse the evolution of cancer-specific mortality.