S. Nag et al., The American brachytherapy society survey of brachytherapy practice for carcinoma of the cervix in the United States, GYNECOL ONC, 73(1), 1999, pp. 111-118
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to survey the brachytherapy practice
for cervical cancer in the United States.
Methods, The Clinical Research Committee of the American Brachytherapy Soci
ety (ABS) performed a retrospective survey of individual physicians of the
ABS and American Society of Therapeutic Radiologists and Oncologists regard
ing the details of the brachytherapy techniques they personally used in the
treatment of cervical cancer patients for the year 1995, The replies (some
of which may have been an estimate only) were tabulated. The scope of this
survey did not allow us to verify the data by chart audits,
Results. A total of about 3500 questionnaires were mailed out; 521 response
s were received. Of these responders, 206 (40%) did not perform any brachyt
herapy for carcinoma of the cervix in 1995, Of the other 315 responders rep
orting a total of 4892 patients treated in 1995, 88% used low dose rate (LD
R) while 24% used high dose rate (HDR), There was a wide variation in the d
oses used. For LDR treatments, the median total external beam radiation the
rapy (EBRT) dose was 45 and 50 Gy and the LDR dose was 42 and 45 Gy for ear
ly and advanced cancers, respectively. For HDR treatments, the median EBRT
dose was 48 and 50 Gy and the median HDR dose was 29 and 30 Gy for early an
d advanced cancers, respectively, The median dose per fraction was 6 Gy for
a median of five fractions. Interstitial brachytherapy was used as a compo
nent of the treatment in 6% of the patients by 21% of responders. Very few
responders treated with pulsed or medium dose rates,
Conclusion. This retrospective survey showed the current brachytherapy prac
tice pattern in the treatment of cervical cancer in the United States and c
an serve as a basis for future prospective national brachytherapy data regi
stry. There was wide variation in the practice pattern, emphasizing the urg
ent need for consensus on these issues, (C) 1999 Academic Press.