The effect of repeated epidural sympathetic nerve block on "failed back surgery syndrome" associated chronic low back pain

Citation
B. Fredman et al., The effect of repeated epidural sympathetic nerve block on "failed back surgery syndrome" associated chronic low back pain, J CLIN ANES, 11(1), 1999, pp. 46-51
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
ISSN journal
09528180 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
46 - 51
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-8180(199902)11:1<46:TEORES>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Study Objective: To assess the therapeutic benefits of repeated epidural lo cal anesthetic administration on pain perception and straight leg raise (SL R) in patients suffering from chronic low back pain. Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study protocol. Patients: 50 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients at least 18 years of age, who had previously undergone spine surgery. Interventions: All participants were admitted to hospital for the 5-day dur ation of the study. Following epidural catheterization, fluoroscopy was per formed to verify correct placement of the epidural catheter. On the first s tudy day, all patients received depomedrol 80 mg, in 10-ml 1% lidocaine, ep idurally. Thereafter, patients were randomized into two equal groups. In Gr oup Bupivacaine (B) 10-ml 0.125% bupivacaine was administered. In Group Sal ine (S), an equal volume of saline was administered. Epidural injections we re preformed twice daily (09H00 and 14H00) for 4 days. Sympathetic blockade was confirmed by the presence of peripheral vasodilatation. Sensory blocka de was assessed using loss of pin prick and temperature sensation. SLR as w ell as patient-generated 100-mm visual analog score (VAS) for pain were per formed prior to each injection, at 15 minutes after injection, and hourly f or 2 hours thereafter. Similar parameters were measured 1 week, 1 month, an d 3 months after discharge. Measurements and Main Results: 46 patients completed the study. VAS for pai n was marginally lower in Group B. However, statistical significance was no t demonstrated. During the hospitalization period, the SLR in both study gr oups significantly (0.008) improved with time. However, no difference betwe en the groups was demonstrated. In both groups, 1 week, 1 month and 3 month s after discharge, the SLR was comparable to prestudy recordings. In Group B, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge, patient-generated VAS for pain were significantly (p = 0.002) higher when compared to pain scores at the time of patient discharge. Conclusion: Repeated lumbar epidural blockade does not decrease pain or imp rove SLR in "failed back surgery syndrome." (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science In c.