Pharmacist-operated drug information centres in Singapore

Authors
Citation
Ly. Lim et Wk. Chui, Pharmacist-operated drug information centres in Singapore, J CLIN PH T, 24(1), 1999, pp. 33-42
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
02694727 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
33 - 42
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-4727(199902)24:1<33:PDICIS>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Objective: Relatively little is known about the organized drug information centres (DICs) in Asia. Here we evaluate the four pharmacist-operated DICs in Singapore and compare them with published information on DICs located in Australia, the U.K. and the U.S., and with established guidelines for qual ity assurance of DICs. Methods: A prospective survey was conducted in 1996 in which two sets of qu estionnaires were developed and distributed to the DIC pharmacists to elici t information on the DIC as well as the DIC pharmacists. In addition, the e nquiry records received by the DICs over the period 1 April to 31 July 1996 were collated for evaluation. Results: All the pharmacist-operated DICs in Singapore were well equipped w ith facilities for information retrieval, storage and dissemination, and th ey had adequate literature resources comparable with DICs in Australia, the U.K. and the U.S. They also complied with many of the DIC guidelines compi led by The Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia, except for the ins titution of formal quality assurance programmes, which was lacking in all c entres. The professional activities of the local DIC pharmacists were also similar to their counterparts in Australia, the U.K. and U.S., but the job scope could be expanded to include other activities that are gaining impetu s among other DIC pharmacists. Postgraduate professional training of pharma cists was inadequate compared with the specialist training received by DIC pharmacists in the U.S. A total of 2517 enquiries were collated for evaluat ion. Physicians were the major class (47-57%) of enquirers in the local hos pitals. The classes of questions received by the DICs were not different fr om those received by DICs elsewhere, although the DICs in the hospitals rec eived a preponderance of questions on dose (20-25%) and product availabilit y (13-16%). More than 60% of enquiries received by the DICs in the hospital s were answered within 5 min, while about 80% of the enquiries required ref erence to not more than one literature resource. Conclusions: The pharmacist-operated DICs in Singapore have comparable stan dards to established DICs in Australia, the U.K. and U.S., while the worklo ad and activities of the local DIC pharmacists are similar to their counter parts in these countries. It is recommended that the DICs institute formal quality assurance programmes and expand the training and job scope of the D IC pharmacists.