Hyaluronic acid-based polymers as cell carriers for tissue-engineered repair of bone and cartilage

Citation
La. Solchaga et al., Hyaluronic acid-based polymers as cell carriers for tissue-engineered repair of bone and cartilage, J ORTHOP R, 17(2), 1999, pp. 205-213
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
ISSN journal
07360266 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
205 - 213
Database
ISI
SICI code
0736-0266(199903)17:2<205:HAPACC>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Culture-expanded bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells different iate into chondrocytes or osteoblasts when implanted subcutaneously in vivo in combination with an appropriate delivery vehicle. This in vivo implanta tion technique is used to test new materials as putative delivery vehicles in skeletal tissue-engineering models. HYAFF 11 and ACP sponges, two biomat erials based on hyaluronic acid modified by esterification of the carboxyl groups of the glucuronic acid, were tested as osteogenic or chondrogenic de livery vehicles for rabbit mesenchymal progenitor cells and compared with a well characterized porous calcium phosphate ceramic delivery vehicle. The implant materials were examined by scanning electron microscopy for differe nces in pore structure or cellular interactions, were quantified for their ability to bind and retain mesenchymal progenitor cells, and were examined histologically for their ability to support osteogene sis and chondrogenesi s after subcutaneous implantation into nude mice. The ACP sponge bound the same number of cells as fibronectin-coated ceramic, whereas the HYAFF 11 sp onge bound 90% more. When coated with fibronectin, ACP and HYAFF 11 bound, respectively, 100 and 130% more cells than the coated ceramics. HYAFF 11 sp onge composites retained their integrity after the 3 or B-week incubation p eriod in the animals and were processed for histomorphometric analysis. As a result of rapid degradation or resorption in vivo, ACP sponges could not be recovered after implantation and could not be analyzed. HYAFF 11 sponges presented more area available for cell attachment and more available volum e for newly formed tissue. Following loading with mesenchymal progenitor ce lls and implantation, the pores of the sponges contained more bone and cart ilage than the pores of ceramic cubes at either time point. Thus, relative to ceramic, HYAFF 11 sponges allow incorporation of twice as many cells and produce a 30% increase in the relative amount of bone and cartilage per un it area. Hence, the hyaluronic acid-based delivery vehicles are superior to porous calcium phosphate ceramic with respect to the number of cells loade d per unit volume of implant, and HYAFF 11 sponges are superior to the cera mics with regard to the amount of bone and cartilage formed. Additionally, hyaluronic acid-based vehicles have the advantage of degradation/resorption characteristics that allow complete replacement of the implant with newly formed tissue.