Deterministic optimization can produce suboptimal reservoir-control policie
s by failing to incorporate adequately the impact of low-probability events
. Resulting operating policies may not efficiently balance the costs of rat
ioning, minor flooding, or other short-term impacts with the severe impacts
of extreme flood or drought. This occurs when deterministic optimization i
s applied to systems that are not "certainty equivalent." This paper demons
trates this by contrasting control policies developed using deterministic o
ptimization of inflow forecasts with control policies using stochastic opti
mization of probabilistic inflows. For a range of hypothetical reservoir-co
ntrol problems, it is observed that deterministic optimization results in c
osts that are greater on average and that are much greater for extreme even
ts, particularly for reservoir systems with limited storage capacity and fo
r objectives described by nonquadratic functions. This is true even when fo
recasts are relatively accurate, such as when streamflows are highly autoco
rrelated.