Effect of mebendazole therapy during pregnancy on birth outcome

Citation
Nr. De Silva et al., Effect of mebendazole therapy during pregnancy on birth outcome, LANCET, 353(9159), 1999, pp. 1145-1149
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
LANCET
ISSN journal
01406736 → ACNP
Volume
353
Issue
9159
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1145 - 1149
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-6736(19990403)353:9159<1145:EOMTDP>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Background In areas endemic for hookworm, routine antenatal mebendazole the rapy could greatly reduce the prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy. At presen t, however, this is not a widely accepted control strategy because of a lac k of data on the safety of the drug. We assessed the effect of mebendazole therapy during pregnancy on birth outcome. Methods A cross-sectional study was done in Sri Lanka, where prescription o f mebendazole to women in the second trimester of pregnancy is recommended. Two hospitals were chosen for the study, and women who gave birth there be tween May, 1996, and March, 1997, were recruited. We compared the rates of major congenital defects, stillbirth, perinatal death, and low birthweight (less than or equal to 1500 g) among babies of mothers who had taken mebend azole during pregnancy with those whose mothers had not taken an anthelmint ic (controls). Findings The rate of major congenital defects was not significantly higher in the mebendazole group than in the control group (97 [1.8%] of 5275 vs 26 [1.5%] of 1737; odds ratio 1.24 [95% CI 0.8-1.91], p=0.39). Among 407 wome n who had taken mebendazole in the first trimester (contrary to medical adv ice), 10 (2.5%) had major congenital defects (odds ratio vs controls 1.66 [ 0.81-3.56], p=0.23). The proportions of stillbirths and perinatal deaths we re significantly lower in the mebendazole group (1.9 vs 3.3%, 0.55 [95% CI 0.4-0.77]), as was the proportion of low-birthweight babies (1.1 vs 2.3%, 0 .47 [95% CI 0.32-0.71]). Interpretation Mebendazole therapy during pregnancy is not associated with a significant increase in major congenital defects, but our results indicat e that it should be avoided during the first trimester. This therapy could offer beneficial effects to pregnant women in developing countries, where i ntestinal helminthiases are endemic.