Four experiments are reported that tested the claim, drawn from mental mode
ls theory, that reasoners attempt to construct alternative representations
of problems that might falsify preliminary conclusions they have drawn. In
Experiment 1, participants were asked to indicate which alternative conclus
ion(s) they had considered in a syllogistic reasoning task. In Experiments
2-4 participants were asked to draw diagrams consistent with the premises,
on the assumption that these diagrams would provide insights into the menta
l representation being used. In none of the experiments was there any evide
nce that people constructed more models for multiple-model than for single-
model syllogisms, nor was there any correlation between number of models co
nstructed and overall accuracy. The results are interpreted as showing that
falsification of the kind proposed by mental models theory may not routine
ly occur in reasoning.