Miniaturisation of many types of sensors and actuators has been realised by
the advances in micromachining and microfabrication. This has led to a wid
e range of applications including microfluidic systems, where developments
have resulted in much research in the area of mu TAS (micro total analysis
systems), used especially in analytical chemistry and chromatography. Among
the main benefits of microsystem technology are its contributions to cost
reduction, reliability and improved performance. However, the packaging of
microsystems, especially microsensors, is one of the biggest limitations to
their commercialisation as it can be the most costly part of sensor fabric
ation. This is because microsystems place extra demands on packaging techni
ques. For example, most microsystems need access to the outside world, othe
r than electrical connection, in order to interact with the medium being me
asured or monitored. To reduce costs, a microsystem may be packaged in plas
tic but because of TCE (thermal coefficient of expansion) mismatches betwee
n different materials within the microsystem, the packaging process may gen
erate high levels of stress which can negatively affect the system's operat
ion and reliability. It is clear that conventional packaging approaches and
materials are inapplicable to microsystems. Three;dimensional packaging te
chniques have great potential for microsystem integration. This paper will
discuss the selection of materials applicable to the 3D packaging of any mi
crosystem, including those containing extremely delicate micromachined stru
ctures such as membranes for micropumps and pressure sensors. (C) 1999 Else
vier Science S.A. All rights reserved.