Transrectal ultrasound with separate measurement of the transition zone volume predicts the short-term outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate
S. Bergdahl et al., Transrectal ultrasound with separate measurement of the transition zone volume predicts the short-term outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate, UROLOGY, 53(5), 1999, pp. 926-930
Objectives. To determine whether the volume of prostatic adenomas as assess
ed by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) influenced the outcome after transureth
ral resection of the prostate (TURP).
Methods. TRUS with total prostate and transition zone (TZ) volume determina
tions was performed preoperatively in 298 consecutive patients undergoing T
URP for benign prostatic hyperplasia without prior urodynamic evaluation. P
ostoperatively, the outcome of surgery was stated as excellent (no or minor
remaining symptoms), improved (but with some remaining symptoms), or failu
re (the same or aggravated symptoms) according to a patient-administered qu
estionnaire. Six possible risk factors were evaluated: TZ volume 20 cc or l
ess, neurologic disorders, previous TURP/transurethral incision of the pros
tate (TUIP), diabetes, indwelling catheter, and age older than 80 years.
Results. Thirty patients (10.1%) had treatment failure, 45 (15.1%) improvem
ent, and 223 (74.8%) had excellent outcome. After subdivision into preopera
tive TZ volume of 20 cc or less and greater than 20 cc, it was found that t
he outcomes of 20.9% (n = 19) were failures if the TZ volume was 20 cc or l
ess but only 5.3% (n = 11) if the TZ volume was greater than 20 cc. Additio
nal independent risk factors for failure were neurologic disorders and prev
ious TURP/TUIP. When all patients with risk factors were excluded (TZ volum
e 20 cc or less, neurologic disorders, previous transurethral surgery, and
diabetes), the risk of failure was 3.3%.
Conclusions, Patients with a preoperative TZ volume greater than 20 cc and
no history of neurologic disorders, previous TURP/TUIP, or diabetes had a v
ery high chance of favorable outcome after TURP, even though no pressure/fl
ow evaluation had been performed preoperatively. UROLOGY 53: 926-930, 1999.
(C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.