Mv. Tefilli et al., Urinary diversion-related outcome in patients with pelvic recurrence afterradical cystectomy for bladder cancer, UROLOGY, 53(5), 1999, pp. 999-1004
Objectives. To evaluate the impact of urinary diversion on disease status,
complications, and subsequent treatment in patients with pelvic tumor recur
rence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
Methods. A retrospective review of 201 consecutive cases of radical cystect
omy for bladder cancer, performed at our institution between March 1991 and
March 1996, identified 33 patients (16.4%) with disease recurrence in the
pelvis with or without systemic metastasis. Urinary diversion in patients w
ith tumor recurrence was an ileal conduit, continent cutaneous diversion, o
r orthotopic neobladder in 19, 3, and 11 patients, respectively. The mean f
ollow-up for all patients undergoing cystectomy was 25.9 months (range 8 to
75). The mean time to diagnosis of local disease recurrence after cystecto
my was 13.9 months (range 5 to 50).
Results. In 21 (63.6%) of 33 patients, pelvic recurrence and systemic metas
tasis were present simultaneously. Disease recurrence was associated with p
oor outcome: only 8 patients (24.2%) were alive and disease free, 7 of whom
had isolated local recurrence without evidence of systemic metastasis. The
re was no difference in overall survival or type of therapy delivered once
disease recurrence was diagnosed between patients with an orthotopic neobla
dder and those with a cutaneous (continent or incontinent) urinary diversio
n. The only diversion-related complication resulting from pelvic recurrence
was 1 case of tumor invasion into an orthotopic neobladder, requiring conv
ersion to an ileal conduit.
Conclusions. The type of urinary diversion did not impact a patient's risk
of complications, the ability to receive salvage treatment, or overall surv
ival once pelvic recurrence was diagnosed. Patients at high risk of pelvic
recurrence should not be excluded from receiving an orthotopic urinary dive
rsion. UROLOGY 53: 999-1004, 1999. (C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc. All righ
ts reserved.