O-6-Methylguanine (O(6)MeG) and O-4-methylthymine ((OMeT)-Me-4) are po
tentially mutagenic DNA lesions that cause G:C-->A:T and A:T-->G:C tra
nsition mutations by mispairing during DNA replication, and the repair
of O(6)MeG and (OMeT)-Me-4 by DNA repair methyltransferases (MTases)
is therefore expected to prevent methylation-induced transitions, The
efficiency of O(6)MeG and (OMeT)-Me-4 repair by different MTases can v
ary by several hundred-fold and the aim of this study was to establish
the biological consequences of such differences in the efficiency of
repair, The ability of three microbial and two mammalian MTases to pre
vent methylation-induced G:C-->A:T and A:T-->G:C transitions is taken
as a measure of their ability to repair O(6)MeG and (OMeT)-Me-4 in viv
o respectively, All five MTases give complete protection against G:C--
>A:T transitions, However, while the microbial MTases give complete pr
otection against A:T-->G:C transitions, the mammalian MTases actually
sensitize cells to A:T-->G:C transitions, We hypothesize that the mamm
alian MTases bind (OMeT)-Me-4 lesions in vivo but that, because they a
re extremely slow at subsequent methyl transfer, binding shields (OMeT
)-Me-4 from repair by the nucleotide excision repair pathway, Results
are presented to support this hypothesis.