LORACARBEF VERSUS PHENOXYMETHYLPENICILLIN IN THE TREATMENT OF RECURRENT STREPTOCOCCAL PHARYNGOTONSILLITIS

Authors
Citation
K. Roos et P. Larsson, LORACARBEF VERSUS PHENOXYMETHYLPENICILLIN IN THE TREATMENT OF RECURRENT STREPTOCOCCAL PHARYNGOTONSILLITIS, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases, 29(2), 1997, pp. 141-145
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
00365548
Volume
29
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
141 - 145
Database
ISI
SICI code
0036-5548(1997)29:2<141:LVPITT>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Knowledge of the treatment of recurrent group A streptococcal pharyngo tonsillitis has, so far, been based on studies of non-recurrent rather than recurrent episodes of the disease. This multicentre, double-blin d, randomized trial was designed to compare the efficacy of loracarbef (200 mg twice daily) vs phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V) (800/1 000 mg twice daily) each for 10 days in the treatment of recurrent gro up A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis. Among the 331 patients enrolle d in the study, 265 were evaluable for efficacy. The combined clinical and bacteriological failure rate was 8.2% in the loracarbef group and 21.5% in the penicillin V group (p = 0.008). Bacterial eradication wa s noted in 90% of loracarbef-treated patients compared to 66% of penic illin V-treated patients (p < 0.0005). The higher bacteriological erad ication and clinical efficacy rate among loracarbef patients might be related to higher stability of loracarbef in the presence of beta-lact amases produced by the oral microflora. These results suggest loracarb ef to be a strong candidate for treatment of patients with recurrent g roup A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis.