K. Roos et P. Larsson, LORACARBEF VERSUS PHENOXYMETHYLPENICILLIN IN THE TREATMENT OF RECURRENT STREPTOCOCCAL PHARYNGOTONSILLITIS, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases, 29(2), 1997, pp. 141-145
Knowledge of the treatment of recurrent group A streptococcal pharyngo
tonsillitis has, so far, been based on studies of non-recurrent rather
than recurrent episodes of the disease. This multicentre, double-blin
d, randomized trial was designed to compare the efficacy of loracarbef
(200 mg twice daily) vs phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V) (800/1
000 mg twice daily) each for 10 days in the treatment of recurrent gro
up A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis. Among the 331 patients enrolle
d in the study, 265 were evaluable for efficacy. The combined clinical
and bacteriological failure rate was 8.2% in the loracarbef group and
21.5% in the penicillin V group (p = 0.008). Bacterial eradication wa
s noted in 90% of loracarbef-treated patients compared to 66% of penic
illin V-treated patients (p < 0.0005). The higher bacteriological erad
ication and clinical efficacy rate among loracarbef patients might be
related to higher stability of loracarbef in the presence of beta-lact
amases produced by the oral microflora. These results suggest loracarb
ef to be a strong candidate for treatment of patients with recurrent g
roup A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis.