Tubular function and tubulointerstitial disease

Citation
P. Futrakul et al., Tubular function and tubulointerstitial disease, AM J KIDNEY, 33(5), 1999, pp. 886-891
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
ISSN journal
02726386 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
886 - 891
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-6386(199905)33:5<886:TFATD>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Tubular transport determined by the fractional excretion (FE) of filtered s olutes was studied in 129 nephrotic patients; 72 patients with mesangial pr oliferation (MesP-NS) and intact tubulointerstitium (group 1), 13 patients with MesP-NS and superimposed tubulointerstitial fibrosis (TIF; group 2), 2 7 patients with mild focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS; group 3), an d 17 patients with severe FSGS (group 4). In the 72 nephrotic patients with MesP-NS and normal tubulointerstitium (no TIF), tubular transport was inta ct (FE of sodium [FENa], 0.5 +/- 0.5; FE of calcium [FECa], 0.3 +/- 0.3; FE of phosphate [FEPO4], 14 +/- 13; FE of uric acid [FEUA], 9.8 +/- 0.5; FE o f magnesium [FEMg], 1.3 +/- 0.5). In the 13 nephrotic patients with MesP-NS and superimposed TIF (4.9% +/- 2%), there was no difference in FE solutes from those in group 1 except for FEMg (3.3 +/- 0.9; P < 0.001). In the 27 n ephrotic patients with mild FSGS (TIF, 28% +/- 9%), four of five variables of FE solutes (FENa, 1.2 +/- 0.7; P < 0.001; FECa, 0.9 +/- 0.8; P < 0.001; FEPO4, 17 +/- 12; P, not significant; FEUA, 16.5 +/- 8; P < 0.001; FEMg, 4. 1 +/-; P < 0.001) were significantly different from those of patients with MesP-NS without TIF, and two of five variables (FECa, FEMg) were statistica lly different from those of patients with MesP-NS with TIF. In the severe c ategory of FSGS (TIF, 69% +/- 19%), all FE solutes were statistically diffe rent from the other groups (FENa, 4.8 +/- 3; FECa, 2 +/- 1; FEPO4, 47 +/- 2 4; FEUA, 37 +/- 18; FEMg, 12 +/- 6). Thus, the results imply that (1) norma l tubular transport reflects an underlying intact tubulointerstitial struct ure, whereas tubular dysfunction indicates an underlying tubulointerstitial disease, and (2) FEMg is the most sensitive index to detect an early abnor mality of tubular structure and function. (C) 1999 by the National Kidney F oundation, Inc.