Midodrine and cool dialysate are effective therapies for symptomatic intradialytic hypotension

Citation
Dn. Cruz et al., Midodrine and cool dialysate are effective therapies for symptomatic intradialytic hypotension, AM J KIDNEY, 33(5), 1999, pp. 920-926
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
ISSN journal
02726386 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
920 - 926
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-6386(199905)33:5<920:MACDAE>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a morbid complication of hemodialysis (H D). Both midodrine, an oral selective alpha(1) agonist, and cool dialysate have been reported as useful therapies for this problem. We performed this prospective crossover study to compare the efficacy of these two therapies, alone and in combination, for IDH, The study consisted of a control phase and three treatment phases: midodrine phase (10 mg oral dose pre-HD), cool dialysate phase (35.5 degrees C), and combination therapy phase (midodrine, 10 mg, and dialysate temperature, 35.5 degrees C). Each phase consisted of nine consecutive HD treatments. Eleven patients (six men, five women; mean age, 67.5 years) with known symptomatic IDH were studied. This cohort was followed up in terms of blood pressure measurements (pre-HD blood pressure, lowest intradialytic blood pressure, post-HD blood pressure), weights, lab oratory values, and interventions for IDH. The lowest intradialytic blood p ressures were significantly better with midodrine and cool dialysate compar ed with the control phase (systolic blood pressure [SBP], 103.9 +/- 4.1 [me an +/- standard error of the mean] and 102.6 +/- 2.9 v 90.6 +/- 2.5 mm Hg, respectively; P < 0.001), as were the post-ND blood pressures (SBP, 116.9 /- 4.0 and 118.2 +/- 3.5 v 109.0 +/- 2.1 mm Hg; P < 0.01), In addition, the lowest intradialytic blood pressures were significantly better with the co mbination phase compared with the control phase (SBP, 103.7 +/- 4.2 v 90.6 +/- 2.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001), as were the post-HD blood pressures (SBP, 122.1 +/- 4.6 v 109.0 +/- 2.1 mm Hg; P < 0.01). There was a significant reduction in the number of nursing interventions performed and volume of saline infu sed for IDH with midodrine and cool dialysate compared with control. There was a trend toward amelioration of hypotensive symptoms with both therapies . Laboratory values, including KW, did not change significantly with either midodrine or cool dialysate. This prospective study shows that both midodr ine and cool dialysate are effective therapies for symptomatic IDH, There d oes not seem to be additional benefit when these two therapies are used in combination, (C) 1999 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.