The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic features of spo
ntaneous esophageal rupture and compare them with those traditionally appli
ed in making this diagnosis. A retrospective 15-year chart review was perfo
rmed on all cases listing esophageal rupture as a diagnosis. Only those cas
es diagnosed by contrast studies or direct visual confirmation were include
d. Facets of the history, physical examination, laboratory results, and X-r
ay procedures were examined and compared with the "classic" presentation of
this diagnosis as noted in current medical texts. Fourteen cases of confir
med esophageal rupture were found. Only a small minority of cases presented
in a fashion resembling a classic case. Esophageal rupture was the admitti
ng diagnosis in 29 per cent of the cases. Laboratory values associated with
esophageal rupture included elevated white blood cell count and hypoxia. T
he chest X-ray was abnormal in all but one patient, with findings of pneumo
thorax and/or pleural effusion in the majority. We conclude that reliance o
n classic findings will lead to misdiagnosis in the vast majority of cases
presenting to the Emergency Department. Conversely, toxic appearance, pleur
al effusion, pneumothorax, elevated white blood cell count, azotemia, and h
ypoxia are all positively associated with this disease. In toxic-appearing
patients with pleural effusions and/or pneumothoraces, spontaneous esophage
al rupture should be considered.