The dynamic relationship between end-tidal sevoflurane and isoflurane concentrations and bispectral index and spectral edge frequency of the electroencephalogram

Citation
E. Olofsen et A. Dahan, The dynamic relationship between end-tidal sevoflurane and isoflurane concentrations and bispectral index and spectral edge frequency of the electroencephalogram, ANESTHESIOL, 90(5), 1999, pp. 1345-1353
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00033022 → ACNP
Volume
90
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1345 - 1353
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(199905)90:5<1345:TDRBES>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Background: Inhalational anesthetics produce dose-dependent effects on elec troencephalogram-derived parameters, such as 95% spectral edge frequency (S EF) and bispectral index (BIS), The authors analyzed the relationship betwe en end-tidal sevoflurane and isoflurane concentrations (FET) and BIS and SE F and determined the speed of onset and offset of effect (t(1/2)k(e0)). Methods: Twenty-four patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists ph ysical status I or II were randomly assigned to receive anesthesia with sev oflurane or isoflurane. Several transitions between 0.5 and 1.5 minimum alv eolar concentration mere performed. BIS and SEF data were analyzed with a c ombination of an effect compartment and an inhibitory sigmoid E-max model, characterized by t(1/2)k(e0), the concentration at which 50% depression of the electroencephalogram parameters occurred (IC50), and shape parameters. Parameter values estimated are mean +/- SD. Results: The model adequately described the FET-BIS relationship. Values fo r t(1/2)k(e0), derived from the BIS data, mere 3.5 +/- 2.0 and 3.2 +/- 0.7 min for sevoflurane and isoflurane, respectively (NS). Equivalent values de rived from SEF mere 3.1 +/- 2.4 min (sevoflurane) and 2.3 +/- 1.2 min (isof lurane; NS). Values of t(1/2)k(e0) derived from the SEF were smaller than t hose from BIS (P < 0.05). IC50 values derived from the BIS were 1.14 +/- 0. 31% (sevoflurane) and 0.60 +/- 0.11% (isoflurane; P < 0.05), Conclusions: The speed of onset and offset of anesthetic effect did not dif fer between isoflurane and sevoflurane; isoflurane was approximately twice as potent as sevoflurane. The greater values of t(1/2)k(e0), derived from t he BIS data compared with those derived from the SEF data may be related to computational and physiologic delays.