Epidural clonidine or bupivacaine as the sole analgesic agent during and after abdominal surgery - A comparative study

Citation
M. De Kock et al., Epidural clonidine or bupivacaine as the sole analgesic agent during and after abdominal surgery - A comparative study, ANESTHESIOL, 90(5), 1999, pp. 1354-1362
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00033022 → ACNP
Volume
90
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1354 - 1362
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(199905)90:5<1354:ECOBAT>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Background: The rationale of this study was to compare high-dose epidural c lonidine with a more commonly used agent, such as bupivacaine. This was per formed to give a more objective idea of the relative analgesic potency of e pidural clonidine, Methods: Sixty patients undergoing intestinal surgery during propofol anest hesia were studied. At induction, the patients received epidurally a dose o f 10 mg/kg clonidine in 7 ml saline followed by an Infusion of 6 mg.kg(-1). h(-1) (7 ml/h) (group 1, n = 20), a dose of 7 ml bupivacaine, 0.5%, followe d by 7 ml/h bupivacaine, 0.25% (group 2, n = 20), or a dose of 7 ml bupivac aine, 0.25%, followed by 7 ml/h bupivacaine, 0.125% (group 3, n = 20), Intr aoperatively, increases in arterial blood pressure or heart rate not respon ding to propofol (0.5 mg/kg) were treated with intravenous alfentanil (0.05 mg/kg), Additional doses of propofol were given to maintain an adequate bi spectral index. The epidural infusions were maintained for 12 h. in cases o f subjective visual analogue pain scores up to 5 cm at rest or up to 8 cm d uring coughing, the patients were given access to a patient-controlled anal gesia device. Results: During anesthesia, patients in group 1 required less propofol than those in groups 2 and 3 (78 [36-142] mg vs. 229 [184-252] mg and 362 [295- 458] mg; P < 0.05) and less alfentanil than patients in group 3 (0 [0-0] mg vs, 11 [6-20] mg; P < 0.05), Analgesia lasted 380 min (range, 180-645 min) in group 1 versus 30 min (range, 25-40 min) in group 2 and 22 min (range, 12.5-42 min) in group 3 (P < 0.05). There was no suggestion of a hemodynami c difference among the three groups except for heart rates that were signif icantly reduced in patients in group 1, Sedation scores were significantly higher in this group during the first 2 h postoperatively. Conclusion: Our results show that high doses of epidural clonidine potentia te general anesthetics and provide more efficient postoperative analgesia t han the two bupivacaine dosage regimens investigated.